http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle-east/text-of-proposed-un-security-council-resolution-on-syria-vetoed-by-russia-china/2012/02/04/gIQAtKIipQ_print.html

Please, indicate wich point of the proposed resolution makes you believe that Nato was authorised to attack Syria?

if mods could delete the post with the stacked quotes + this post when you see it.

http://globalspin.blogs.time.com/2012/01/24/trouble-down-south-why-hong-kong-and-mainland-chinese-arent-getting-along/

In part, Hong Kong people’s negativity toward mainland Chinese reflects discontent over the Communist government’s control over the supposedly autonomous region.

i.e bigotry is acceptable toward yellow communists.

Hong Kong’s colonial past is one reason why many see such a rigid delineation between “us” and “them.” Large numbers of Hong Kong Chinese retain British or other foreign travel documents and take a balanced view of the colonial era — viewing it as a time of racial or social injustices, certainly, but also as source of many of the city’s defining advantages, including common law, a global outlook and media freedom.

Is this a liberal way of saying “our uncle-tom”?

http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/101east/2011/11/201111298154826963.html
On this edition of 101 East we ask if Chinese migrants have a right to share in Hong Kong’s wealth.

Lets rephrase it to: On this edition of 101 East we ask if Mexican migrants have a right to share in America’s wealth.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/hongkong/9056268/Hong-Kong-rails-against-invasion-of-Chinese-locusts.html

A vast cultural divide continues to separate Hong Kong, which prides itself on its legitimate entrepreneurial energy, independent legal system and freedom of speech, from the corrupt economic free-for-all and repressive rule that characterises the communist-run mainland.

Reunification in 1997 after 155 years as a British colony was supposed to draw Hong Kong close into the embrace of the motherland. But a University of Hong Kong survey in December revealed that the number of Hong Kong residents identifying themselves as Chinese had sunk to a 12-year low.

…more liberal doublespeak, etc, etc.

ps: how’s liberalism doing in Egypt? what happened to all the “twitter revolutionaries”? back in the usa no doubt; sipping star bucks, campaigning about chinese slave labour on their ipads.

http://globalspin.blogs.time.com/2012/01/24/trouble-down-south-why-hong-kong-and-mainland-chinese-arent-getting-along/#comments

In part, Hong Kong people’s negativity toward mainland Chinese reflects discontent over the Communist government’s control over the supposedly autonomous region.

i.e bigotry is acceptable toward yellow communists.

Hong Kong’s colonial past is one reason why many see such a rigid delineation between “us” and “them.” Large numbers of Hong Kong Chinese retain British or other foreign travel documents and take a balanced view of the colonial era — viewing it as a time of racial or social injustices, certainly, but also as source of many of the city’s defining advantages, including common law, a global outlook and media freedom.

Is this a liberal way of saying “our uncle-tom”?

http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/101east/2011/11/201111298154826963.html
On this edition of 101 East we ask if Chinese migrants have a right to share in Hong Kong’s wealth.,

Lets rephrase it to: On this edition of 101 East we ask if Mexican migrants have a right to share in America’s wealth.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/hongkong/9056268/Hong-Kong-rails-against-invasion-of-Chinese-locusts.html

A vast cultural divide continues to separate Hong Kong, which prides itself on its legitimate entrepreneurial energy, independent legal system and freedom of speech, from the corrupt economic free-for-all and repressive rule that characterises the communist-run mainland.

Reunification in 1997 after 155 years as a British colony was supposed to draw Hong Kong close into the embrace of the motherland. But a University of Hong Kong survey in December revealed that the number of Hong Kong residents identifying themselves as Chinese had sunk to a 12-year low.

..more liberal doublespeak, etc, etc.

ps: how’s liberalism doing in Egypt? what happened to all the “twitter revolutionaries”? back in the usa no doubt; sipping star bucks, campaigning about chinese slave labour on their ipads.

All of the above media stations have foreign policy agendas to fulfil, therefore their views should be taken with a massive grain of salt.

And again I ask “when does “having a field day” mean the same thing as “condone” as you explicitly stated? Try sticking to the same issue this time.

If they don’t care – then there is no issue at all. Why waste your breath here?

When does “having a field day” mean the same thing as “condone”?
I notice the Mainland media and the HK media are also having a “field day”

Then you must have also noticed when liberals not so subtly claimed that the nanjing massacre was invented by the prc as anti-japanese propaganda or when the little girl was run over by a truck it was the product of 2000 years of chinese degeneracy and communism. Liberalism sure is love and peace.

You guys are pitiful.

CDE, is that you???

Also – I wonder if “Fact Man” was Dan? Maybe you could check the IP?

As far as I know, Steven Dickinson doesn’t have license to practice law in China. He may affiliate himself with an office that has a license (e.g. be a consultant to a Chinese law firm), but he himself – and certainly Harris & Moure – does not have license to practice in China. I know of many American law firms that have legitimate real legal offices in China, something not true of Harris & Moure. There is no shame in admitting the above. Many lesser firms outsource work to local firms behind the scene – and they certainly can serve some client needs with those arrangements. (I know the above from personal correspondence with Dan).

My statement here is not meant to disparage Steven or Dan or Harris & Moure. Of course, if things have changed – and if I happen to be wrong now, Dan or Steven is always free to come forth to to this forum (or in their forum if they like, in which case we would love to get links) to publicly correct any statements I or others have made here.

It’s funny the (western) liberal media are having a field day about this hk-mainland thing. Do you think they would ever condone the same harassment and discrimination towards; for example, mexicans and their anchor babies? Would you even be able to get that kind ad in a paper without having your life threatened by every sanctified liberal, minority group, moral crusader in America? or a better example – the case of filipino maids seeking permanent HK residency, liberals all howled about xenophobic hongkongers. Yet here are liberals sympathising with the same overt prejudice; using it push their own agenda; their so-sacred moral convictions easily brushed aside all to justify their political crusade against China.