David Peng made a prediction in his blog An Anachronist’s Life on July 1st, thee days after the Weng’An riot:
… I predict, the “Hu Jintao style” government response [which emphasises on proactive reporting the news and guiding the public discussion/opinion in order to restore/maintain stability] is going to be followed by acts in the “organizing department style” , that the entire local leadership team is going to be summarily dismissed.
He was right. The following is a translation of an article titled “Party secretary and head commisioner of Weng’An county both dismissed”, coming from the Xinhua Net.
Guizhou provincial government continues pursuing officials responsible for the June 28th Weng’An incident. Authorities at various levels have decided on July 4th to dismiss Weng’An county party secretary, Wang Qin, and head commisioner, Wang Haiping, from their positions. [Note: these are the top 1 and 2 positions at the county level.]
… [Further details of the dismissals as well as the replacement personales are laid out.]
Before this, the political commissar, Luo Laiping, and party secretary and chief, Shen Guirong, of the Weng’An county public security bureau were both dismissed as well. The replacement commissar and chief already assumed command on July 4th.
Party secretary of Guizhou province, Shi Zongyuan, pointed out in a recently convened update meeting: the direct trigger of the incident was a dispute over the nature of a young girl’s death; However, the root cause went much deeper and broader: the interests of the common folks were frequently violated in the courses of local mineral resource development, population resettlement, and rebuilding. In responding to those conflicts, some officials exhibited rough attitude, utilized crude methods and even abused the law enforcement power. As such, the failures by the leadership team at the county level and relevant departments can not be excused.
…
It’s also interesting to point out the suit of other related articles published at the Xinhua Net. They generally demonstrate an attempt at openly reporting the cause and facts of the Weng’An riot without evasiveness. The titles are translated and listed blow:
- Guizhou province party secretary criticize Weng’An county party secretary: he is only looking for excuses
- Guizhou province party vice secretary: Weng’An incident exposes long accumulated conflicts in the area
- Guizhou responds to rumors: no relatives of officials involved in the incident
- Guizhou officials analyze the cause of the incicent in depth: some folks have long held grievances
- Root cause for Weng’An incident: some officials are unable to face the citizens
Buxi says
Wow, that’s beautiful. I had no idea the Chinese state media + central government would tackle the officials in Weng’an so directly. I was already satisfied with making an example of the officials responsible for police work in the county… but to see it extended into such a broad criticism.
I love it. This is completely new territory they’re on, new precedent since probably the mid ’80s.
pug_ster says
I agree. I believe that China can take some kind of constructive criticism without losing face.
nanheyangrouchuan says
Beijing will always have to walk a tight line with local officials because they are also the ones who keep a lid on anti-Beijing activities.
But this is good news.
MutantJedi says
Yes, I’m very encouraged by how this story played out and by how quickly the events unfolded. One of my biggest concerns would be that consideration for the games would short-circuit the actions that needed to be taken. It seems that, in the end, the state media was more concerned about saving face for the sake of the games than officials like Shi Zongyuan.
Buxi says
The Chinese press is now giving us more from Shi Zongyuan’s first day in Guizhou:
http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2008-07-05/122015878042.shtml
This article also repeats the quote we first heard in the reporter’s blog in my previous entry; Shi Zongyuan emphatically called for officials responsible for public security in Weng’an “to be dismissed from class”.
MutantJedi says
Wow… How unique is Shi Zongyuan? I wonder what his future will be. Will this sort of reporting hurt him or help him?
Buxi says
@MutantJedi,
I don’t think there’s much prospect for Shi Zongyuan to be promoted. He’s already 62, the same generation as Hu/Wen, and not likely to join the central leadership team.
And unfortunately, there’s still a lot of criticisms of him on the Chinese internet. A lot of Chinese netizens are, exactly like I said in the previous thread, focused on the original state media’s version of what he said, which put the blame on the people. They think he’s merely reversing himself now because of public pressure. That is not correct, because the above conversation, since his critical comments were made on 6/30… they were just never made public.
But I hope this sort of direct reporting of straight talk becomes typical. I can’t handle another similar report that says “the leadership have helped stabilize the emotions of the public.”
Buxi says
Some of these overseas Chinese dissidents really make me sick. Yang Jianli is very high on that list:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0708/p09s02-coop.html
Maybe he’s confusing his script for Weng’an with his script for Lhasa.
ProudChinese says
Seems like a decision from central government, and the common method for cadre-people conflict (官民矛盾) is no mercy to both sides, so rioters got punished and officials sacked, and one sure thing is that the jailed rioters will receive lenient treatment because they offered the replacing officials a higher position.
Buxi says
@ProudChinese,
Really? The replacing officials have a higher position? I haven’t heard of this, can you explain?