• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Hidden Harmonies China Blog

Hidden Harmonies China Blog

As China Re-Awakens, Finding New Harmonies in a Brave New World...

  • About Us
  • China Charities
  • FAQ
    • Terms of Service
  • Recommended Readings

Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-2010, by Richard F. Grimmett, Specialist in International Security

July 4, 2011 by Mr. Allen 5 Comments

Larry from Bear Canada just passed along a copy of this report detailing instances of use of U.S. armed forces abroad from 1798-2010.  Thought it would be interesting to share this with everyone.  I’ve also placed this in the our Recommended Reading List, which is grossly incomplete, but does give some reference to some interesting reads.Here is the link to the report:

Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-2010 (Richard F. Grimmett Specialist in International Security – March 10, 2011)

Filed Under: Announcements, aside, politics Tagged With: anti war, Richard F. Grimmett, u.s. interventionism, u.s. militarism, u.s. military, u.s. world order

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. YinYang says

    July 6, 2011 at 3:31 pm

    Now that the Cold War is over, I wish the U.S. being the sole superpower would lead the world, and especially in the context of military adventures abroad, only do so within the context of the U.N.. Libya is an example of a hegemonic institution, U.S.-lead NATO, abusing U.N. rules. Continuing that behavior, the U.S. and NATO are perpetrating a world culture of might is right. And, that is clearly not leadership.

    If the U.S. leaves that gap unfulfilled, then it is a squandered opportunity.

    Some other country will have to step up.

  2. raventhorn2000 says

    July 6, 2011 at 3:52 pm

    Technically, US is a military dictatorship by the definition of its own laws.

    The US president has the unquestioned power to mobilize military without the consent of the elected Congress.

    Clinton and Obama are only 2 recent examples, where they have violated the War Power Act, but Congress could not challenge them.

    US Supreme Court has refused cases setting limits of War power of the President.

    By every sense of the term, US qualifies as a military dictatorship (regardless of how popular its government may be), because the real power to command the military is NOT in the hand of the civilian leaders, but in the hand of the Commander-in-chief (a single branch of the government without checks or balances).

  3. raventhorn2000 says

    July 12, 2011 at 6:25 am

    http://www.businessinsider.com/france-qaddafi-2011-7

    France getting cold feet about the ongoing unsuccessful bombing of Libya, and now openly calling for negotiations with Qaddafi.

    (BTW, I predicted France would be the 1st to quit. The French are easy to get into a fight, but also easy to quit.)

  4. raventhorn2000 says

    July 12, 2011 at 6:38 pm

    In the same breath, France is now talking tough about Syria, cheerleading US criticisms of Syria.

    Looks like France is just messing around with its war toys here and there.

    *One of these days, one of these countries will take some kind of revenge on France. It’s a matter of time.

    This is hardly the kind of win friends type of diplomacy that France is doing. It’s the jerking around kind of diplomacy.

  5. raventhorn2000 says

    July 13, 2011 at 8:13 am

    http://www.smh.com.au/world/libyan-rebels-run-riot-20110713-1he6i.html

    Libyan Rebels conducted purge on Qaddafi loyalist town after taking it.

    Where were the NATO “protect the civilian” forces??

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The TikTok Ban That Failed. This Ban Is Not Really About ‘National Security’ Rather It Is About Greed And Control.
  • 大山的女兒–Daughter of the Mountain
  • No, the Chinese does not express glee over Shinzo Abe’s assassination and how western propaganda got it wrong about what Chinese thinks of Abe
  • The Overt Politicization of the Origins of Covid-19
  • The U.S. Loves Wars…

Recent Comments

  • Hengxin on 大山的女兒–Daughter of the Mountain
  • Hompuso on Short Note on Media Disinformation: No, No, No… CIA is not Impersonating Others in Hacking Others … There is just not Proof!
  • Abraham on The Overt Politicization of the Origins of Covid-19
  • purislot on (Letter) Web search for Tiananmen not censored, but do people care?
  • hanhan on 且谈1989年的天安门事件

Tag Cloud

america Beijing censorship China china-u.s. relations coronavirus corruption culture dalai lama defamation againt Chinese democracy earthquake economy education Environment featured freedom freedom of speech Google government history hong kong human rights humor india internet japan media media bias nationalism olympics politics propaganda racism reform riot rule of law sino-u.s. relations sixfour South China Seas taiwan tiananmen tibet U.S. China Relations xinjiang

Archives

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • China Dialogue
  • China in Africa: The Real Story by Deborah Brautigam
  • Chinese Portal
  • ESWN (東南西北)
  • Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
  • Fool's Mountain (sibling blog)
  • iLook China
  • Moon of Shanghai
  • Outcast Journalism
  • Professor Ann Lee
  • Sino Platonic
  • The Anti-Empire Report

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in