• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Hidden Harmonies China Blog

Hidden Harmonies China Blog

As China Re-Awakens, Finding New Harmonies in a Brave New World...

  • About Us
  • China Charities
  • FAQ
    • Terms of Service
  • Recommended Readings

China’s official stance on bin Laden’s death, “milestone for anti-terrorism”

May 3, 2011 by YinYang 1 Comment

Xinhua has officially reported Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu on China’s stance to news regarding Osama bin Laden’s death. The article said:

“China has taken note of the announcement,” Jiang said, “We believe the death of Osama bin Laden is a milestone and a positive development for the international anti-terrorism efforts.”

“Terrorism is the common enemy of the international community. China has also been a victim of terrorism, ” said Jiang.

She said China has always opposed to terrorism of all forms and has been actively participating in the global anti-terrorism efforts.

I feel China’s attitude is helpful to the U.S. and at the same time responsible and consistent in a way true to China’s foreign policy.

As Jiang said, China is also a target of terrorism. The world in general should stand up and oppose violence. And, certainly, nation states are capable of committing the same atrocities. Some argue that the current NATO bombings of Libya is too a form of terrorism. In our messy world, one’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter. How do we reconcile grievances on both sides?

When little guys commit terrorism, they get hunted down. When big guys do the same, they get resentment. That is pretty much how our world works today. I tend to believe that if the international system is just such that both the little guys and the big guys have recourse for their grievances, then perhaps atrocious acts would diminish.

But, today, for some reason, I feel pessimistic.

Human nature itself, after-all, is ugly. Look at everywhere – people commit crimes for all sort of reasons. They rape, murder, burglarize, steal, and do all sorts of heinous things without their victims ever doing anything bad to them in the first place.

A good friend said to me once, perhaps the best way to improve on what we have today is for a super powerful state to take over the planet. A one-world government indiscriminant in prosecuting crimes may do it. Would we accept the U.S. ruling over everyone? China? U.N.?

Since our world is organized around nation states where the big and powerful dominate, then, at least amongst them, they should not sponsor or incite the small guys to terrorism. They are probably better off combating terrorism together too, regardless of their politics with each-other. Otherwise we’d see escalation of terrorism; more airplanes and buildings blowing up. That would be an unpleasant sight.

Filed Under: Opinion, politics Tagged With: Osama bin Laden, terrorism

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. xian says

    May 8, 2011 at 4:46 pm

    That’s nice, but for as long as there are nation-states there will be politicians who play one faction against another for their own interests, slapping labels on them to justify whatever it is they’re trying to portray. As a country it’s best for China to maintain a strong defense and a healthy sense of self-interest while avoiding taking sides in political gaming in other parts of the world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The TikTok Ban That Failed. This Ban Is Not Really About ‘National Security’ Rather It Is About Greed And Control.
  • 大山的女兒–Daughter of the Mountain
  • No, the Chinese does not express glee over Shinzo Abe’s assassination and how western propaganda got it wrong about what Chinese thinks of Abe
  • The Overt Politicization of the Origins of Covid-19
  • The U.S. Loves Wars…

Recent Comments

  • Hengxin on 大山的女兒–Daughter of the Mountain
  • Hompuso on Short Note on Media Disinformation: No, No, No… CIA is not Impersonating Others in Hacking Others … There is just not Proof!
  • Abraham on The Overt Politicization of the Origins of Covid-19
  • purislot on (Letter) Web search for Tiananmen not censored, but do people care?
  • hanhan on 且谈1989年的天安门事件

Tag Cloud

america Beijing censorship China china-u.s. relations coronavirus corruption culture dalai lama defamation againt Chinese democracy earthquake economy education Environment featured freedom freedom of speech Google government history hong kong human rights humor india internet japan media media bias nationalism olympics politics propaganda racism reform riot rule of law sino-u.s. relations sixfour South China Seas taiwan tiananmen tibet U.S. China Relations xinjiang

Archives

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • China Dialogue
  • China in Africa: The Real Story by Deborah Brautigam
  • Chinese Portal
  • ESWN (東南西北)
  • Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
  • Fool's Mountain (sibling blog)
  • iLook China
  • Moon of Shanghai
  • Outcast Journalism
  • Professor Ann Lee
  • Sino Platonic
  • The Anti-Empire Report

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in