A casual glance of English news bulletins on the web reveal articles such as the following:
- China cracks down in Inner Mongolia to thwart protests (LA Times)
- China Clamps Down in Bid to Halt Mongolian Protests (WSJ)
- China must avoid force in Mongolia: Amnesty (AFP)
I am dismayed at the tone of the coverage from the West.
If a potentially socially explosive situation arises anywhere in the world – whether it is in L.A. between blacks and whites or between tribes in Somalia – I’d think the responsible thing is to urge restraint amongst the people and for the government to make a show of force. It may even be time to impose some restrictions on movements (as local conditions dictate) for heads to cool down. I’d not call sending in police and guards to keep the peace and urge cooler head “crack down” – or “clamping down.”
The most recent protests apparently have arisen in response to the killing of an ethnic Mongolian herder by a coal driver who was ethnic Han. Tensions are high not just because of ethnic elements, but because of social and economics elements (the person killed was a herder, from a socioeconomic background of someone who may not have benefited generally as much from China’s recent economic development as someone with skills to drive a truck). There may also be tensions arising between communities regarding how much those who benefit from mining should compensate those who suffer most from environment damages that arise from such activities.
In any case, the government appears to be taking the right actions, seeking calm.
The Strait Times repoted:
THE top political leader of China’s vast northern region of Inner Mongolia had a meeting with local students in a bid to placate public anger, state media reported, after the hit-and-run death of a herder sparked six days of protests by ethnic Mongolians.
In the first response from the ruling Party to the demonstrations, Inner Mongolia’s Communist Party chief Hu Chunhua told students and teachers on Friday he was representing the government to seek their views on the situation and said’public anger has been immense’.
‘Please be assured, teachers and students, that the suspects … will be punished severely and quickly, so that the … rights of victims and their families can be resolutely safeguarded,’ the Inner Mongolian Daily cited Mr Hu as saying.
The xinjiang riots of a few years ago arose in large part from ethnic rumors and innuendos of a factory brawl in Shaoguan (fanned in part by outside forces).
This is not time for inflaming tensions, or the urging government to leave a vacuum. This is time for government to step in and take an active role to lead and preserve peace.
Chris Devonshire-Ellis says
Actually you’re not referring to Mongolian protests. You are referring to protests in the Chinese Province of Inner Mongolia. Mongolia itself is a separate nation.
Allen says
Chris,
Maybe I need to clarify. By Mongolian, I meant ethnicity – or formally the Chinese Mongolian Nationality. I didn’t mean the Mongolia Nation.
YinYang says
These media are disgusting.
kchew says
For the Western media, reports on ethnic unrest in China are juicy news eagerly sought by editors back home. They also tend to use inflamatory language in their coverage. In this particular case one AFP report mentioned that the riot was due to the killing of a herdsman, as if the security forces were involved.
I bet if similar events happening in other Asian or African countries, there Western media will not be interested unless it is a slow news day.
In fact, there is little or no outrage at all when 16 Afghan children and women were murdered in recent Nato bombing raid. The news barely made the headlines. However, when an ethnic minority died in in the hand of the police in China, one can be assured of the outrage by Western media, human right groups and their politicians.
learn chinese in china says
Western media are really disgusting, they say things which are not true just in order to make money…
Wukailong says
I notice with some interest that the party secretary of Inner Mongolia is Hu Chunhua, who’s believed by quite a number of people to be at the center of the sixth generation of leadership in China after Xi Jinping. The way he handles the issue will affect his future. Of course, apart from the major demonstration in Xilinhaote there doesn’t seem to been any mistakes made so I think this will fizzle out as far as he’s concerned.
Of course, speculating on who’s going to be the leader in 2022 might seem a bit premature when we haven’t even confirmed that Xi Jinping will indeed become the next president, but I can’t help myself there…
Allen says
Good commentary from Global Times:
Charles Liu says
Southern Mongolian Human Rights Information Center receives $75k-85k a year from the NED, big suprise.
TonyP4 says
* The media have not much good material on China recently. Several years ago, we had Tibet riot, human rights violation, and then the currency manipulation. So, it is great material for them. I’ve not used the human rights article for a long time.
http://tonyp4idea.blogspot.com/2009/11/china-human-right-lover.html
* As larger cities are building, Mongolia should allocate areas for raising herd. Alternatively, they can grow hay and ship the hay to the farms for the cattle.
Bayan Olgy says
Good debate and comment about the differences between Inner Mongolia and Mongolia here: http://www.2point6billion.com/news/2011/05/30/a-tale-of-two-mongolias-9381.html
Allen says
@Bayan Olgy #10,
Pretty dumb article. If Chris wants to write something based off his own confusion, he may go ahead. But it’s pretty silly to have him comment his confusion here and then you to link to his article here. This is not a thread about Inner Mongolia vs. Mongolia. And I’ve never heard of the great confusions of people lumping Mongolians with Han Chinese. There is much in the literature about the history of China, Mongolia, and the various ethnic groups in Eastern Asia. It’s perfectly legitimate for both China and Mongolia (of today) to consider Genghis Khan as their own.
I have reason to believe you are spamming based on cookie and ip trace. Let this be a warning.
TonyP4 says
Mongolians ruled China as in Yuan dynasty. Mao treated them as one of the minorities officially.
Russians wanted Mongolia as a buffer zone. The way they treated Mongolians are terrible through out history, esp. after Genghis Khan.
YinYang says
In regards to: http://www.2point6billion.com/news/2011/05/30/a-tale-of-two-mongolias-9381.html
I was over at 2point6billion.com last night and had my comment censored out. I am trying to reconstruct what I said, and it roughly went as follows:
Allen says
@YinYang #13,
If you read the quote you copied: Chris uses the incident of one potentially criminal driver and attribute to the entire nation. He then further stretches that one potential criminal act to accuse China of colonialism on par with European colonialism. That’s pretty absurd.
And if you read the next paragraph:
This is well documented. Here are some in English.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1910893,00.html
http://ubpost.mongolnews.mn/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2446&Itemid=42
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/02/mongolia-far-right
As I’ve written before, the call for an ethnically pure nation, coupled with hatred, is reminiscent of the Nazis. Things like this in my opinion endangers world peace.
See also https://hiddenharmonies.org/2008/05/is-self-determination-a-tool-for-liberation-in-todays-world/
Allen says
@YinYang #13,
About being censored on Chris’s site, I wouldn’t worry too much about it. I’ve had personal email discourse with him before. To be honest, I think Chris Devonshire-Ellis has barely a high school’s education and has been holding out in Asia to be something more than he is. His credentials have been exposed by so many – he has made so many enemies on the Internet – it’s not even funny.
I’m not condoning any of the personal verbal vendettas spawn, but really, I think it takes a lot of effort to piss off that many people that much.
For our purposes, we don’t have time for crap. What you did is right: just state what you need to state, and if he censors, state it again here and move on. There are other things that are better worth our time.
YinYang says
@Allen #14
Yes, exactly.
@Allen #15
Yup, not bothered by the censorship. Mainly want to warn people that in the Internet age, there could be people pretending to be certain minority groups to create this wedge and animosity between groups of real people. We always need to keep that in mind.
Always ask yourself after reading a ‘China’ article in the West – is it trying to perpetrate more hate and misunderstanding between groups or is it genuinely pushing understanding for parties concerned.
YinYang says
I got an email from an editor at 2point6billion.com saying my comment was caught up in the spam queue due to a link embedded in my comment.
The person I really wanted to address the comment to was a WS Lee there. But it seems my comment was reinstated after he threw in the towel and left.
Oh well.
TonyP4 says
Chinese and Mongolians belong to one nation for centuries. The Mongolian child will melt your heart.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QW0o9mKf-jY
Allen says
I’ve been too busy this past week to spend much time blogging. But I think the article titled “Green motives in Inner Mongolian unrest” by Wu Zhong at Asia Times is worth citing (http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/MF08Ad01.html).
WS Lee says
@YinYang
I am WS Lee, Thanks for your support. It is time for us who are English literate to roll up our sleeves & fight these sorts of smearing campaigns by the western media as silence may mean consent.