Home > News > Full text of Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping’s interview with Washington Post

Full text of Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping’s interview with Washington Post

February 13th, 2012 Leave a comment Go to comments

Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping is currently in the United States reciprocating a visit Vice President Biden took last year in China. Xi is expected to become the new Chinese President for the 2013-2017 term. If the CPC renews, he would also reign from 2018 to 2022. America is interested in getting to know him, because he will help shape the China-U.S. relationship for years to come. His daughter is currently studying at Harvard College. (I might add: for those think China is afraid of American ideas, they ought to think twice.) Xi is also known as a “princeling,” though one of Biden’s top aids said he is a very thoughtful person. Below is a transcript of his response to Washington Post right before embarking on his trip to the U.S..

Full text of Xi’s interview with Washington Post
Updated: 2012-02-13 20:31
(Xinhua)

BEIJING – Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping answered written questions from The Washington Post on Sunday in Beijing, prior to his visit to the United States. The following is a transcript of Xi’s answers.

Q: This year marks the 40th anniversary of President Nixon’s visit to China. How would you describe the course of China-US relations in the past four decades?

A: Forty years ago, leaders of our two countries, with extraordinary wisdom and vision of statesmen, reopened the long-closed door to China-US exchanges. Since then, China-US relations have forged ahead despite some twists and turns and made historic achievements, bringing huge benefits to both countries and peoples. China-US relations have become one of the most important, dynamic and promising bilateral relationships in today’s world. When I visited the United States for the first time in 1985, our bilateral trade was merely $7.7 billion, and only some 10,000 mutual visits were made each year. Last year, our trade topped $440 billion, and mutual visits exceeded three million.

What has happened over the past 40 years tells us that a sound and stable China-US relationship is crucial for both countries and for peace, stability and prosperity of the Asia-Pacific region and the world at large. During President Hu Jintao’s visit to the United States in January last year, the two presidents agreed to build a cooperative partnership based on mutual respect and mutual benefit. This decision fully captures the features and requirements of China-US relations in the new era, that is, to develop mutually beneficial cooperation as partners based on the principle of mutual respect.

Q: Some people in the United States believe that China-US business cooperation has benefited China at the expense of the United States. What is your view?

A: Mutual benefit is the defining feature of China-US business ties. Since the establishment of diplomatic relations, China-US trade has grown over 180 times. Over the past ten years, US exports to China have increased by 468 percent and created more than three million jobs for the United States. Forty-seven out of the 50 US states have seen three-digit or even four-digit growth in their exports to China. And US consumers have saved over $600 billion by using Chinese products. A survey conducted by AmCham China last year shows that 85 percent of the US-invested enterprises in China saw their revenue grow in 2010, and 41 percent of them recorded higher profitability in China than their global average. The US investment in China has boosted US exports to China, accelerated US industrial upgrading, and contributed to the growth of the US economy.

As economic globalization gathers momentum, China and the United States have become highly interdependent economically. Such economic relations would not enjoy sustained, rapid growth if they were not based on mutual benefit or if they failed to deliver great benefits to the United States. The Americans who know the real picture of China-US economic relations, including those in the business community, will echo this point.

Frictions and differences are hardly avoidable in our economic and trade interactions. What is important is that we properly handle these differences through coordination based on equality, mutual benefit, mutual understanding and mutual accommodation. We must not allow frictions and differences to undermine the larger interests of our business cooperation.

We have taken active steps to meet legitimate US concerns over IPR protection and trade imbalance, and we will continue to do so. We will continue to press ahead with the reform of the RMB exchange rate formation mechanism and offer foreign investors a fair, rule-based and transparent investment environment.

At the same time, we hope the United States will take substantive steps as soon as possible to ease restrictions on high-tech exports to China and provide a level playing field for Chinese enterprises to invest in the United States.

Q: Some say that China is the reason for the United States to focus its global strategy on the Asia-Pacific. How do you see China-US relations in the Asia-Pacific?

A: China and the United States have more converging interests in the Asia-Pacific region than in anywhere else. In recent years, our two countries have coordinated closely under the framework of APEC and ASEAN Regional Forum, and enhanced communication and cooperation on regional economic integration, counter-terrorism, non-proliferation, combating transnational crimes, disaster preparedness and reduction, poverty alleviation and relevant regional hotspot issues, thus giving a strong boost to peace and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific.
What the Asia-Pacific countries care most is to maintain economic prosperity and build on the momentum of economic growth and regional cooperation. At a time when people long for peace, stability and development, to deliberately give prominence to the military security agenda, scale up military deployment and strengthen military alliances is not really what most countries in the region hope to see.

The vast Pacific Ocean has ample space for China and the United States. We welcome a constructive role by the United States in promoting peace, stability and prosperity in the region. We also hope that the United States will fully respect and accommodate the major interests and legitimate concerns of Asia-Pacific countries.

Q: How do you evaluate the cooperation between China and the United States on international and regional issues and global challenges?

A: In recent years, China and the United States have conducted effective coordination and cooperation in addressing major international and regional issues and meeting global challenges. This has enriched China-US relations and consolidated and expanded the strategic foundation of the relationship. China and the United States have joined hands and worked together with other countries to counter the international financial crisis and promote global economic recovery. We coordinated positions and worked for consensus at the climate change conferences in Copenhagen, Cancun and Durban. We advanced denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula and the Six-Party Talks process. We opposed the development and possession of nuclear weapons by any Middle East country in order to maintain regional peace and security. Our two countries have also had effective coordination in addressing such hotspot issues as Afghanistan, South Asia, Sudan and the Middle East.

We are at a time when the negative impact of the international financial crisis and the European debt crisis continues to spread, regional hotspot issues crop up from time to time and traditional and non-traditional security threats are intertwined. Under such new circumstances, it is all the more important for China and the United States to communicate, coordinate and cooperate more closely and work together to play a constructive and responsible role in upholding and advancing world peace, stability and development.

Q: I learned that you will be going to Iowa and Los Angeles during this visit. How do you see the role of local and people-to-people exchanges in the overall China-US relations?

A: Mutual understanding and friendship between the two peoples provides a solid foundation and an inexhaustible driving force for the growth of China-US relations. I visited Iowa in 1985 when I was working in China’s Hebei Province. I saw local corn farming and processing and stayed with a local family for a couple of days. I was deeply impressed by America’s advanced technology and the hospitable and industrious American people. That visit drove home to me the importance of closer exchanges between our peoples and gave me a better understanding of China-US relations.

China and the United States are two great countries, and the Chinese and American people are well disposed to and interested in each other. We all want to exchange views and learn from each other, deepen friendship and seek common development. There is no reason for our two countries not to engage in friendly cooperation. I am convinced that, with the backing of the 1.6 billion Chinese and American people, our relationship will bring greater peace, prosperity and development to the world.

Q: What’s your favorite sport? Do you like basketball or football? Do you watch the NBA games?

A: I like sports, and swimming is my favorite. Doing physical exercises keeps one fit and healthy and helps one work more efficiently. I think we all need to strike a balance between work and relaxation. This can keep us energetic and help us do our job better.

NBA games are exciting to watch and have global appeal. They are very popular in China. I do watch NBA games on television when I have time.

Categories: News Tags:
  1. February 13th, 2012 at 14:11 | #1

    Usually you do not sleep with your banker.

  2. Wayne
    February 14th, 2012 at 03:17 | #2

    To tell the truth I am really uncomfortable about this ‘princeling’ thing. It is nepotism pure and simple.

    Although I will be the first to admit that Xi Jinping did have a hard time of it during the CR.

    But if you are the leader of your country, surely you would make a good statement by sending your children to a university in China. And his sister lives in Canada?

    It is one thing for ordinary folk who have to make a living and seek the best opportunities for their children, wherever they may be in the world.

    But if you are the leader of the country, you are the servant of the country, and have a duty to go beyond what would perhaps be expected of ‘ordinary’ people.

    Things have come a long way from the time of Mao —-who lost over half his family in the revolutionary struggle and his son in the Korean war. Mao actually forced his kids to take a relatively low profile…it is only recently that his grandson has been making a bit of a splash in China.

    And with Mr Xi’s daughter at Harvard, what are the odds that she will date errr……or rather jump the species divide and bring home a errrr…….well let us say someone who is a very close relation of Cheetah the chimpanzee….just as furry but only more pale complected.

    And what is the bet that we could well soon have a ‘furry’ friend right inside China’s first family?

    After all it seems all the rage nowadays. Tung Chee Hwa of Hong Kong has a simian son-in-law, and Marshal Ye Jianying’s grand-daughter also seems to have collected her spouse from some animal shelter.

    Surely China has an anti-bestiality law that can be invoked in protest against this worrying trend?

  3. silentchinese
    February 14th, 2012 at 06:19 | #3

    Surveying what the US press has said about the visit.

    This strikes me as the most arrogant and foolish. IF Xi ever said these things that the author think the next president of PRC *ought* to say, that he would be basically giving up on many if all of china’s positions and will be essentially kowtowing to the American supremacy, and turns a blind eye to the hands that washington had in generating all these crisis.

    http://www.npr.org/2012/02/14/146857978/weekly-standard-ten-things-from-china-s-new-leader

    what strikes me even more, that the one who wrote these are not some random brainless pundits,
    but as some one who “served in the office of the Secretary of Defense as a China country desk officer” and “is now a national security consultant.”

    Foggy Bottom indeed has some interesting but stupid people running the place.

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.