Home > Analysis, culture, economy, Foreign Relations, General, Opinion, politics, trade > New Internet Economy Puts Dent In “Boycott China”

New Internet Economy Puts Dent In “Boycott China”

I have long maintained that boycotts rarely work well as a tool of political protest.  Even when mobilized as a collective national action like a trade embargo, history has not shown much effectiveness in causing political change, other than merely increasing bitterness (like the Embargo against Cuba).

Against a much larger target, with even broader scope, such as “boycott China”, the sheer size of lunacy of such a proposition is immediately apparent.  Chinese economy is not pinned down in a few special economic sectors, it’s large and diverse, and most importantly international.  It produces final products and components and material.  It’s not merely economical for businesses, it’s necessity of businesses to buy Chinese products.

But even more interestingly, the increase in the internet economy has shown that it’s not just companies like Walmart that dictates the improbability of “boycott China”, it’s increasingly the end user purchasers who are making it impossible to “boycott China”.

Even with the fear of “counterfeit”, “food poison”, “lead paint”, etc., the internet economy (across borders) has increased significantly, with almost no regulations, (other than dubious attempt to tax).

China was early in internet economy.  Many Chinese young people use internet to sell and buy things.  (My sister-in-law has an internet business in China).  Chinese internet businesses offer almost EVERYTHING that can be bought legally (and some illegally), food, clothing, automobiles, parts, components, toys, etc.

Many of them are now also generally accessible globally.  It’s the equivalent of a giant “home shopping network”.

This year, on China’s “Cyber Monday”, November 11, internet shopping smashed previous year’s record, reaching $3.1 Billion (in 1 day), more than double of US’s cyber Monday figure.  China’s internet economy is expected to reach $650 billion a year by 2020.

http://money.cnn.com/2013/11/10/news/economy/china-cyber-monday/

Increasingly, the customers of China are getting sophisticated.  Why go to Walmart, when you can order directly from Walmart’s Chinese supplier (with no markup)??  (The risk of bad quality is about the same).

One might wonder, how much of this is really going on?

It’s hard to say, most who do buy directly on internet from China do not necessarily advertise that.  They do occasionally brag about it on some internet sites like Reddit.com.

But there is 1 interesting parallel:  US Senior citizens are increasingly turning to ordering cheap prescription drugs from Canada, India, and China, due to the high cost of drugs in US.

US government has sometimes cracked down on the practice, but it is very difficult.  Beyond the political unpopularities of busting Senior Citizens for illegal imports, it is practically difficult.  How does the US Customs intercept individual mail parcels for banned goods?!  You might get a few here and there, but most get through.

Similarly, this present the future improbability of “boycott China”:  Even if Walmart decides to stop buying from China, the internet buyers won’t stop.

 

  1. November 11th, 2013 at 07:55 | #1

    Lol… who is still trying to boycott China these days? I thought even the most diehard China-bashers have given up on barking up that tree by now. XD

  2. Black Pheonix
    November 11th, 2013 at 09:48 | #2

    @Mister Unknown

    I still see them grumbling around on the net.

    Nowadays, it’s more cast as more targeted boycotts, like “boycott Beijing Olympics 2008”, etc.

    The logic is, well, if we can’t go after EVERYTHING from China, let’s just target 1 thing that’s really public.

    But the logic also fails. Well, the more targeted, the less it will impact the overall. And the MORE public the target, the more likely that there are people who don’t want to boycott.

    A friend once said to me, “nothing make people want to go watch a movie or read a book, more than if that movie or book had some controversies.”

    Lots of bad movies get watched more if they had controversies.

    The “boycott China” movement actually generated more interest for China, and more people now are defending China on the net.

    People are not stupid. They don’t just take the word from boycotters. They know that someone is making money from the boycotts and political causes.

  3. November 11th, 2013 at 19:04 | #3

    My response to such boycott attempts is:

    “Awwww… how cute…” <:-D

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.