• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Hidden Harmonies China Blog

Hidden Harmonies China Blog

As China Re-Awakens, Finding New Harmonies in a Brave New World...

  • About Us
  • China Charities
  • FAQ
    • Terms of Service
  • Recommended Readings

On the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) Between the U.S. and Phillipines

April 29, 2014 by Mr. Allen 5 Comments

 

Obama and Aquino Toasts
Obama and Aquino Toasts

The U.S. and Phillipines leadership would like to portray their new relationship as rosy, strategic and deep.  On the street though, talking to the average Joe, one might get a very different impression.

Billed as the cornerstone of growing US and the Philippines strategic partnership and of the U.S. pivot back to Asia, the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) between the U.S. and Philippines has been touted as the highlight of the meeting of President Obama and President Aquino in Manila this week. The official line is broadcast to the world even though many in Philippine vehemently oppose the agreement (see e.g. this response from BAYAN).  Many Filipinos still remember the 1.5 million or so who died during the brutal US conquest of the Philippines in the early part of the 20th century, and they do not want the U.S. to have any military presence on Philippines soil again.

Adopting the ECA will require the Philippines government to circumvent Philippines’ Constitutional ban on foreign military bases and troops by characterizing America’s presence in Philippines as “authorised foreign temporary facilities.” Instead of going to the people regarding whether the Philippines should allow foreign troops in, the Philippines government has decided to hide behind a legal charade.

The EDCA is not the first time the U.S. secured with Philippines an agreement to have military presence inside the Philippines.  The notorious RP-US Visiting Forces Agreement, which the Philippines ended in the late 1980’s, allowed for US military forces to have a rotational presence in the Philippines for any length of time, ostentatiously to to train and inter-operate with the Philippine armed forces.  The VFA allowed US military not only to use Philippines facilities but also to retain jurisdiction over criminal cases, including capital offences, involving US troops.

Unequal as the VFA was, the EDCA is arguably even worse as far as loss of Philippines sovereignty is concerned.  Unlike the VFA, the EDCA does not limit the amount of increase in the rotational presence of US military forces and also explicitly allows for the building of US military bases and stations.  While the American troops would putatively be limited to areas where the Philippine armed forces have a presence, the wording is such that Philippines presence can be technically established by something as trite as relegating Filipino troops to be perimeter guards (hired at the Philippines’ expense) of American bases. (see e.g. this aljazeera article)

Besides military incursion, many Filipinos are also outraged by the Aquino government’s promise to amend the Philippine constitution to allow foreign (e.g. U.S.) investors unlimited ownership of land and businesses. The constitutional ban exists because of Philippines colonial experience.  Many – for good reasons – are very sensitive about it. The high-handed way by which Aquino has surrendered military independence make most Filipinos nervous about his ability to protect Philippines economic sovereignty in the aftermath of such a Constitutional amendment.

To top everything off, the Philippines government has also aimed “to impress Obama with the capture of alleged leaders of the Communist Party of the Philippines as proof of the success of Oplan Bayanihan, a military plan aligned with the US Counterinsurgency Guide” (from the aljazeera article linked above).  So on this trip, the Aquino government is serving Obama on a silver platter a triple cocktail of military acquiescence, land cessation, and political prisoners.  No wonder so many are so pissed off…

Anyways, here is a dramatic video of people protesting against the U.S.  in the wake of Obama’s visit.  And below are some pictures of people protesting in the streets.

[Show as slideshow]
article-2614715-1d6a747500000578-273_634x423
487171423
article-2614715-1d6919ff00000578-864_634x441
x2

article-2614715-1d691a5300000578-690_634x425
134788
article-2614715-1d6a7df800000578-917_634x426
article-2614715-1d6b623100000578-723_634x422

article-2614715-1d6b637d00000578-400_634x376
article-2614715-1d6c02e400000578-87_634x451
article-2614715-1d6c0edf00000578-7_634x421
x1

x3
x4

Filed Under: Analysis, News, politics Tagged With: maritime territory disputes, Philippines, pivot to asia, South China Seas

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. pug_ster says

    April 30, 2014 at 5:01 am

    Here’s a youtube video of it.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=111HJUi5cTM

  2. Black Pheonix says

    April 30, 2014 at 7:14 am

    True imperialists don’t come demanding land, they come demanding that you sell them land for cheap and for protection.

    It’s a truly sad state for Philippines that they cannot see that.

  3. pug_ster says

    April 30, 2014 at 7:37 am

    Funny thing is that 20 years ago the Philippine government kicked the US out of their country but it seemed that America paid these Philippine officials to undo that.

  4. Black Pheonix says

    May 1, 2014 at 10:18 am

    It’s an up-side-down world, when open public disputes are considered “bullying”, but backstabbing neo-colonial military base building and 1-sided trade deals are considered “alliances”.

  5. ersim says

    May 1, 2014 at 2:28 pm

    Once the U.S. took away from Spain it’s colony in 1898 by invading, occupying and establishing a pro-U.S. puppet regime, the Phillipines was never a “sovereign nation” anyways. No surprise the corrupt and criminal Filipino “government” will always cater to their Yankee imperial masters regardless of what the Filipino people say or want.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The TikTok Ban That Failed. This Ban Is Not Really About ‘National Security’ Rather It Is About Greed And Control.
  • 大山的女兒–Daughter of the Mountain
  • No, the Chinese does not express glee over Shinzo Abe’s assassination and how western propaganda got it wrong about what Chinese thinks of Abe
  • The Overt Politicization of the Origins of Covid-19
  • The U.S. Loves Wars…

Recent Comments

  • Hengxin on 大山的女兒–Daughter of the Mountain
  • Hompuso on Short Note on Media Disinformation: No, No, No… CIA is not Impersonating Others in Hacking Others … There is just not Proof!
  • Abraham on The Overt Politicization of the Origins of Covid-19
  • purislot on (Letter) Web search for Tiananmen not censored, but do people care?
  • hanhan on 且谈1989年的天安门事件

Tag Cloud

america Beijing censorship China china-u.s. relations coronavirus corruption culture dalai lama defamation againt Chinese democracy earthquake economy education Environment featured freedom freedom of speech Google government history hong kong human rights humor india internet japan media media bias nationalism olympics politics propaganda racism reform riot rule of law sino-u.s. relations sixfour South China Seas taiwan tiananmen tibet U.S. China Relations xinjiang

Archives

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • China Dialogue
  • China in Africa: The Real Story by Deborah Brautigam
  • Chinese Portal
  • ESWN (東南西北)
  • Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
  • Fool's Mountain (sibling blog)
  • iLook China
  • Moon of Shanghai
  • Outcast Journalism
  • Professor Ann Lee
  • Sino Platonic
  • The Anti-Empire Report

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in