• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Hidden Harmonies China Blog

Hidden Harmonies China Blog

As China Re-Awakens, Finding New Harmonies in a Brave New World...

  • About Us
  • China Charities
  • FAQ
    • Terms of Service
  • Recommended Readings

From the Beijing Olympics, Come the Drums of Change

August 14, 2008 by bianxiangbianqiao 25 Comments

Harold Meyerson at the Washington Post compares the Beijing Olympics with Russian involvement in Georgia and believes that the Olympics are a game-changing event in world history while Russia’s Georgian adventure is not. The theme of the Chinese model of development offering an alternative to Western democracy has been repeated by many in Western media.

The Drums of Change, Herald Meyerson, Washington Post

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: China, olympics

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. wuming - wumaodang says

    August 14, 2008 at 2:00 am

    Meyerson clearly thought about the matter a little more than most of the Western media types. David Brooks of New York Times also thought about this.

    I thing, however, this collectivism vs. individualism dichotomy between China and US is still superficial. But I have to think a little more before I can state my objections coherently,

  2. MoneyBall says

    August 14, 2008 at 2:35 am

    He overstated it about the individualism v collectivism. It’s more just a culture thing than -ism.
    To me 2008 ppl beating drum isnt scary at all, they were just doing some labour work. a little bit stupid, maybe.
    However, seeing thousands of Americans singing praying crying all together in a megachurch scared the shit out of me.

  3. BMY says

    August 14, 2008 at 2:56 am

    his tone is very familiar(cold war) when he talks about Russia.”Russia’s invasion is surely the most shocking”
    Georgia unnecessarily attacked south ossetia ,where most of people hold Russia passport , before he got shocked by Russia’s action.

    sorry, no more of the topic on this thread

  4. FOARP says

    August 14, 2008 at 11:03 am

    @BMY- Why not? It’s certainly an issue. I would be interested to see what the reaction of people in China is to a country trying to take back a province that has achieved de facto independence through invasion, and being kicked out of that province by the forces of a super power.

  5. BMY says

    August 14, 2008 at 11:31 am

    @FOARP,

    Let me state my point (not CCP ‘s point):

    I am against any violence and bloodshed.

    to regain a de facto independent region by force: I am against it. That said, I don’t agree to take south ossetia back by shelling it. In China’s case, I am against taking back Taiwan by shooting missiles on it.

    to separate a peaceful country under the name of self-determination by force and bloodshed: I am against it. that’s the case in south ossetia in the early 90s

    My bottom line is : co-exist and peace between different people

    please note: above only represent my view and my daughters’ view for now.(they might change their view when they grow up under the influence of the self-determination ideology under any condition)

  6. CLC says

    August 14, 2008 at 2:11 pm

    reaction of people in China

    Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun 😉

    Check out this cartoon for A brief history of the Georgian fiasco.

  7. Dan says

    August 14, 2008 at 2:36 pm

    This guy is way over the top. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. The kid is a hero and we should leave it at that. He is no different from the firefighters who went into the twin towers on 9/11 who were frequently quoted as saying they were just doing their job.

  8. S.K. Cheung says

    August 14, 2008 at 8:11 pm

    To FOARP #4 and BMY #5:
    I too agree that the South Ossetia issue, and China’s and Chinese people’s position on same, would be of great interest, though not necessarily appropriate for this blog.
    On the one hand you have Georgia, pro-Western and NATO-aspiring, trying to forcibly take back an area that has exerted self-determination for over 15 years. On the other hand, you’ve got Russia, aiding and abetting a breakaway “state”. The ironies are enormous. For Russia, they’ll support South Ossetia’s (and Abhkazia’s) self-determination while refuting Chechnya’s.
    So, will China side with Russia while giving tacit approval for self-determination, or will they side with pro-Western Georgia in renouncing it? I’d love to find out…go with old allegiances, or with principle.

    In a couple of years, I’m sure there’ll be books documenting the Georgian brain-cramp of August 2008.

    Looks like I’m clearly a generation older than BMY’s daughters; I’m already there with the self-determination bit.

  9. wuming says

    August 14, 2008 at 8:26 pm

    @S.K. Cheung

    There is a very easy solution for China in regard to the South Ossetia issue — support neither side. Entirely consistent with its non-interfering stand, while tell the world to “butt out my affairs” too.

  10. CLC says

    August 14, 2008 at 9:21 pm

    @SKC

    self-determination, isn’t that an old topic? 🙂

    https://hiddenharmonies.org/2008/05/23/is-self-determination-a-tool-for-liberation-in-todays-world/

  11. S.K. Cheung says

    August 15, 2008 at 2:34 am

    To CLC:
    absolutely, said my bits back then, as I’m sure both of us recall. Which is why I only made passing mention of it in response to BMY’s point. No need to rehash, right? WHere did Allen Yu go, anyhow? 🙂

  12. yo says

    August 15, 2008 at 2:36 am

    me thinks self-determination is used by many, not just Russia, to push cold-war politics. 🙂

  13. S.K. Cheung says

    August 15, 2008 at 2:54 am

    To Wuming:
    good point. Maybe she can at least support the ceasefire then, no?

    The “butting out” bit does appear to be the default Chinese position; however, the Chinese saying also goes that, if you’re on the road and witness an injustice, it behooves you to help out/ speak up (which is far preferable to drawing swords).

  14. S.K. Cheung says

    August 15, 2008 at 2:58 am

    To Yo:
    I would disagree with you on this one. The cold war is long gone, but the aforementioned concept is very much contemporary, I would say.

  15. yo says

    August 15, 2008 at 3:02 am

    SKC,
    Cold war politics still exists in the sense that it’s Russian influence vs Nato influence.

  16. S.K. Cheung says

    August 15, 2008 at 3:17 am

    To Yo:
    agreed. Sad but true reality of the early 21st century.

  17. BMY says

    August 15, 2008 at 3:19 am

    @S.K.Cheung

    “Looks like I’m clearly a generation older than BMY’s daughters; I’m already there with the self-determination bit.”

    myself is not there yet with that “bit ” . don’t say ” I’m clearly a generation older than BMY” 🙂

  18. S.K. Cheung says

    August 15, 2008 at 3:30 am

    To BMY:
    that’s cute. I suspect we’re of the same generation, give or take a couple of years. I agree that “bit” is not everyone’s cup of tea, but I do think it grows on you after a while, especially in a western society.

  19. Wahaha says

    August 15, 2008 at 3:44 am

    US and Poland signed the missile shield deal.

    2nd cold war is around corner.

    China (or CCP) is off the hook.

  20. BMY says

    August 15, 2008 at 4:09 am

    @S.K.Cheung

    I believe we are of the same generation. 🙂
    I totally agree “it grows on you after a while” . Then I will be debating with my daughters on this blog in 20 years .:-)

  21. MoneyBall says

    August 15, 2008 at 4:36 am

    This is a fight between yankies and ruskies, ruskies are not only demonstrating their sheer power and will, but also mocking US on its hypocrisy and double-standard. For the first time in recent history, US feels it cant do nothing militarily, or morally. This is the most serious challenge US has faced after vietnam. Its impact to the new world order will be profound, way beyond caucus.

    What would China do? stay as far away as possible, and pray to all Gods to catch a break while Russia is getting all the spot lights, LOL, first al Qaeda now ruskies, the Chicoms are really lucky sobs.

  22. BMY says

    August 15, 2008 at 4:56 am

    we are all off the topic.
    BXBQ 老师 would like to discuss collectivism vs. individualism here.
    come on , people.

    Joel and Oldson are expats on these culture differences.

  23. bianxiangbianqiao says

    August 15, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    BMY,

    老师可不敢当。大家互相学习,共勉,共勉。
    I am sick and tired of the Olympics. One more bite will make me throw up.

  24. CLC says

    August 16, 2008 at 11:16 am

    @SKC

    Allen is still commenting from time to time under his alias. Pls see About page 😉

  25. S.K. Cheung says

    August 17, 2008 at 1:47 am

    Thanks CLC.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • 大山的女兒–Daughter of the Mountain
  • No, the Chinese does not express glee over Shinzo Abe’s assassination and how western propaganda got it wrong about what Chinese thinks of Abe
  • The Overt Politicization of the Origins of Covid-19
  • The U.S. Loves Wars…
  • Paul Krugman reaches another low over Covid Vaccines

Recent Comments

  • Hengxin on 大山的女兒–Daughter of the Mountain
  • Hompuso on Short Note on Media Disinformation: No, No, No… CIA is not Impersonating Others in Hacking Others … There is just not Proof!
  • Abraham on The Overt Politicization of the Origins of Covid-19
  • purislot on (Letter) Web search for Tiananmen not censored, but do people care?
  • hanhan on 且谈1989年的天安门事件

Tag Cloud

america Beijing censorship China china-u.s. relations coronavirus corruption culture dalai lama defamation againt Chinese democracy earthquake economy education Environment featured freedom freedom of speech Google government history hong kong human rights humor india internet japan media media bias nationalism olympics politics propaganda racism reform riot rule of law sino-u.s. relations sixfour South China Seas taiwan tiananmen tibet U.S. China Relations xinjiang

Archives

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • China Dialogue
  • China in Africa: The Real Story by Deborah Brautigam
  • Chinese Portal
  • ESWN (東南西北)
  • Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
  • Fool's Mountain (sibling blog)
  • iLook China
  • Moon of Shanghai
  • Outcast Journalism
  • Professor Ann Lee
  • Sino Platonic
  • The Anti-Empire Report

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in