• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Hidden Harmonies China Blog

Hidden Harmonies China Blog

As China Re-Awakens, Finding New Harmonies in a Brave New World...

  • About Us
  • China Charities
  • FAQ
    • Terms of Service
  • Recommended Readings

China’s Supreme People’s Court clarifies trial procedures in citizens suing local governments over information disclosure

August 13, 2011 by YinYang 4 Comments

In May 2008, the State Council issued “Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Open Government Information” (中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例) went into law, requiring government departments to disclose a very wide range of information to the public and media. (See my prior article, “China’s determined and long march towards rule of law.”) Since then I have been keeping an eye out for new developments. China’s media watchdog, General Administration of Press and Publication (GAPP), few weeks ago declared illegal for governments or any other entities to blacklist journalists or to stop them from reporting.

Today, I saw this Xinhua report on China’s Supreme People’s Court clarifying trial procedures in citizens suing local governments over information disclosure. It clarifies how citizens could sue. This is a very important message to the public on what rights they have.

Not a lot of details, but it does give us an idea China is moving seriously more towards the publics’ right to know.

In my recent trip to China, I had a conversation with a Chinese auto worker, who thought corruption is the most pressing problem. I offered the idea that these measures taken by Chinese society now to force government departments to disclose information will help. And, I continue to be encouraged seeing what is happening.

“Judicial rules to boost govt transparency”
Updated: 2011-08-13 18:00
(Xinhua)

BEIJING – China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a judicial explanation to regulate and standardize trial procedures for the country’s increasing number of government information disclosure cases in a bid to promote governmental transparency.

The explanation, which was issued on Friday and published in Saturday’s edition of the People’s Court Daily, a newspaper run by the SPC, confirmed that citizens may file lawsuits against their local governments if their requests for information disclosures are rejected or if they do not receive a response from the government before a specified deadline.

The regulation specified cases that the courts should accept, including governments’ denial or delay of information disclosures upon public request.

Under the new rules, citizens are also entitled to bring lawsuits if their local governments fail to respond to disclosure requests,even if they do not have a direct stake in the disclosure.
If the government is required to publicize information on its own initiative but fails to do so, citizens may first ask the government to disclose the information and sue the government if their prior requests are refused, the explanation said.

In some cases, the courts can include an order of disclosure in their sentences, which can help to solve disputes in a more timely fashion, an official with the SPC told the newspaper when explaining the rules.

China issued a regulation regarding the disclosure of government information in May 2008, ensuring public access to administrative and regulatory information.

The SPC official said that according to Friday’s explanation, government departments that deny disclosure requests must offer valid reasons for their denials or provide evidence to the courts that specifies that the requested information is classified.

Information involving state secrets, commercial secrets or individual privacy should not be released. However, commercial secrets and individual private information can be disclosed with proper consent, the explanation said.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: rule of law, transparency

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. C. Custer says

    August 15, 2011 at 1:29 am

    Sounds like another good regulation (China has lots of them). The question is, will it be enforced or will the citizens who attempt to sue local governments using this as justification end up in black jails like the rest of the 上访者?

    Too soon to know. But I hope it is enforced, and I wish they’d do a more serious job of enforcing a lot of these kids of regulations.

  2. raventhorn2000 says

    August 15, 2011 at 6:49 am

    Too soon to know? Sounds like you already know.

    Perhaps too soon to speculate.

  3. YinYang says

    August 15, 2011 at 10:55 am

    lol. C.Custer clearly can read and write in English, so I wager this is a mindset issue. I’ll repeat a part of the first sentence in the article:

    increasing number of government information disclosure cases

    That means, people are suing and hence an increasing number of disclosure cases, and thus standardizing the procedures helps streamline.

  4. Al says

    August 15, 2011 at 4:33 pm

    It definitely is a mindset issue in C.Custer case, this is just one of (too) many examples…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • 大山的女兒–Daughter of the Mountain
  • No, the Chinese does not express glee over Shinzo Abe’s assassination and how western propaganda got it wrong about what Chinese thinks of Abe
  • The Overt Politicization of the Origins of Covid-19
  • The U.S. Loves Wars…
  • Paul Krugman reaches another low over Covid Vaccines

Recent Comments

  • Hompuso on Short Note on Media Disinformation: No, No, No… CIA is not Impersonating Others in Hacking Others … There is just not Proof!
  • Abraham on The Overt Politicization of the Origins of Covid-19
  • purislot on (Letter) Web search for Tiananmen not censored, but do people care?
  • hanhan on 且谈1989年的天安门事件
  • Twinkle Industries on Open Forum

Tag Cloud

america Beijing censorship China china-u.s. relations coronavirus corruption culture dalai lama defamation againt Chinese democracy earthquake economy education Environment featured freedom freedom of speech Google government history hong kong human rights humor india internet japan media media bias nationalism olympics politics propaganda racism reform riot rule of law sino-u.s. relations sixfour South China Seas taiwan tiananmen tibet U.S. China Relations xinjiang

Archives

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • China Dialogue
  • China in Africa: The Real Story by Deborah Brautigam
  • Chinese Portal
  • ESWN (東南西北)
  • Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
  • Fool's Mountain (sibling blog)
  • iLook China
  • Moon of Shanghai
  • Outcast Journalism
  • Professor Ann Lee
  • Sino Platonic
  • The Anti-Empire Report

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in