Home > Uncategorized > Where Did Lei Feng Gone?

Where Did Lei Feng Gone?

During the last year I have read quite a few articles on people being indifferent to others in distress. For example a little girl ran over by a car and recording of CCTV showed pedestrians and cars ignored her for a long time until a poor woman searching for recycled bottles stopped to help and asked for help. Another case of an old man fell off a motorbike in flooded city street and drowned in a few inches of water because nobody offered to help. Of course there were other articles on elderly fell down and Samaritan offering help and was instead blamed for causing it and financially held responsible until some were cleared by surveillance TV showing their innocence.

From some of the comments I read blaming either the elderly for being greedy and demand Samaritan laws be passed or decline of traditional Confucian morality, or legal system should issue harsher punishments for false accusations. It got me thinking where did Lei Feng gone? The problem I described is much more than just the legal dispute between accuser and accused, greed, or superficial lack of humanity.

During the past few years there were periodic attempts at reviving the spirit of Lei Feng, from articles in People’s Daily to exhortations from leaders, yet the reaction is pretty pro forma and even cynical. For someone like me who were teens during the late 1950s, that spirit is what we aspire to be. Slogans like “Serve the People”, “To Where the Motherland Needs Us the Most”, and examples like Norman Bethune, and Edgar Snow whom I saw again on the montages of documentaries during the performance celebrating the 70th anniversary over Japan were inspirations. So what has changed? And how do we bring back Socialism/Maoism morality?

During the last 40 years China has been richer immensely, hundreds of millions were lifted from poverty. Yet the chasm between rich and poor has also widened, for the middle class they aspire to be rich yet afraid of falling back into poverty. Those afraid to intervene gave the excuse of afraid to be involved and falsely accused, in other words they have something to lose. While the garbage collection woman is poor, and have nothing to lose other than her humanity. Instead of playing the blame game and excoriate those who failed to get involved or those falsely accusing Samaritans, we should examine the real problem, the privatization of medicine and associated costs. For the elderly jostled and fell mostly are from the poorer sectors of society, they need someone to blame for the medical cost even if sometimes unfairly. Similarly the patents whose outcome of treatment didn’t meet expectation and resulting clashes against health workers speak volumes about alienation due to the high cost of medicine.

When Szechuan earthquake occurred, the central government spare no efforts and costs to alleviate suffering, and people donated to the relieve efforts to show their sympathy and unity. Recent announced reforms in SOE split them to profit and non-profit parts. I would suggest that China consider hospitals and medicine be part of that reform. Nationalize all privately owned hospitals and socialize the cost of medicine. No one should have to worry about the cost of medicine so people will not hesitate to give aid and comfort to the unfortunate. I think Xi is working in that direction anyway by medical insurance. The cost can easily be covered by cracking down on all the tax evasion going on by the middle class or additional tax.

Global Times recently commented on Mao being evaluated by Deng as 70/30, and they have not been talking about the 30%, yet to me they have also avoided talking about the 70%. For returning Lei Feng back into the hearts of common people we need to study those 70% and learn to continue them.


Categories: Uncategorized Tags:
  1. September 26th, 2015 at 19:24 | #1

    I don’t have any insight to the big issue you raised, but speaking from day-to-day experience, when people focus so much of their daily energy on personal success – on making money for themselves or their family – feelings and spirits of social responsibility or cohesion inevitably get crowded out. Is this a part of the problem?

    On the one hand, we want people to live connected to society – to their fellow brethren? But is living the revolution spirit for the long term sustainable? Is living for humanity natural? Or are we individual like animals…

    There is a saying in Africa:

    Every morning in Africa, a Gazelle wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion or it will be killed. Every morning a Lion wakes up. It knows it must outrun the slowest Gazelle or it will starve to death. It doesn’t matter whether you are a Lion or a Gazelle… when the sun comes up, you’d better be running.

    Are we all to be like the gazelle: just take care of yourself, and let the rest be the rest. After all, isn’t it stupid trying to feel sorry for the gazelle that was downed … or that lion that might starve…

  2. N.M.Cheung
    September 26th, 2015 at 20:27 | #2

    There is always tension between self interest and altruistic instincts. When Homo Sapiens evolved, the strong certainly survive better than the weak, yet the strong need to protect the weak (women and children) for the specie to propagate. The lion cannot hog the kill for himself only, and mother gazelle do try to divert predators away from young gazelles. Human nature being slow to evolve compare with the lightning speed of technology today. Mao wants to change human nature in a few generations and he failed, but society especially richer one should provide the safety net for her citizens if possible. China is presently in a position to do so and should do it. The reception of Pope Francis in U.S. and the predatory capitalism of drug firm buying up orphan drug and raising price 5000% should make people think.

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.